My thoughts on…the nude Britney Spears statue
It’s true what they say, art just isn’t what it used to be. A nude statue of Britney Spears giving birth to Sean Preston was made by Daniel Edwards. Yes, there she is in all her glory, on all fours and buck-naked on a bearskin rug. It is called “Monument to Pro-life: The Birth of Sean Preston”. The Pro-lifers are hailing the statue as a monument to pro-life, and hailing Spears for putting family before career, unlike many celebrities. I know, the Pro-lifers are really desperate for an idol. I didn’t know the cause was going so badly. While making the statue, emphasis was placed on her “lactiferous breasts”, “protruding navel”, “water retentive hands” and “widened hips for birthing”. But the thing is, Spears had a C-section! Plus she didn’t even pose for the statue.
When I first saw it, I said “What the…? Spears is doing porn now? Federline finally cleaned her out.” When recovered from the shock of it all, I realized that it was a statue. I kinda feel like a perv when I look at that picture. You know how awkward it is be staring at such a photo on a public computer, with people passing and staring at the screen? The question I hear everyone asking is “Why don’t they show the back end?” Because they know y’all are perverts, and you’ll corrupt the artistic integrity of the statue by making it a part of your sick, twisted fantasies. Enjoy it while you can guys, ‘cause that’s the closest you’ll get to seeing Britney naked.
It really, really is something else. It has to be satirical.
Hmmm-I don’t get it either
It’s a Britney love fest out there these days.
The statue really doesn’t make sense in light of her c-section.
It wouldn’t matter if she did NOT have a C-section. Who gives birth naturally in that position? The artist needs a birds and bees discussion: We don’t pop babies out of our ass while doing yoga in downward dog.
it doesn’t even look like her
That’s….. gross.
I definitely don’t get it. The bearskin rug really makes it skeezy for me. Not only do woman not give birth on their hands and knees, but they definitely don’t do it on bearskin rugs…
thanks for your post on my blog regarding this abomination. I guess having a c-section is they the way to go to be immortalized.
did she really have a c section?
that is sooo funny!
I am just as Pro Life as anyone could be, yet I don’t see the value of having a life-sized Britney, with her butt high in the air, with her baby crowning, as any way to show support of any Pro Life agenda. She looks more like she trying to conceive a baby instead of delivering one. No, this is just the artist’s way of drawing attention to himself in a vulgar voyeuristic way.
That poor kid is going to be stuck with that statue for the rest of his life.
I shudder at the thought of having a life size statue of my mom - naked and on all fours. Jesus Christ, what the hell was she thinking?
LOL, Trish. Very well stated! These aren’t the cave days anymore. No woman gives birth in that position. Actually, it looks gross and perverted. The big question is, why??
pro-life? i want to put that bady back in there any say “hells no, Britney Spears shouldn’t have no baby. put it back before she destroys it. for the love of god don’t let it get out.”
i’ve always thought the end of the world would fell different.
i am greatly disturbed